What
If It's All True, What Then?
Part 1: 6 April - 14 May 2011
Simon Callery, Angela de la Cruz, Louise
Hopkins,
Peter Joseph, Ingo Meller,
Avis Newman, Rebecca Salter
Part 2: 18 May - 25 June 2011
Paul Caffell, Stuart
Elliot, Alexis Harding,
John Henderson,
Ian Homerston, Oliver Perkins, Jon Thompson
Private View:
Tuesday 5 April, 6–8pm |
MWhat If It’s All True? What Then? is the second
of two exhibitions curated by Andrew Mummery for Mummery + Schnelle,
which take a critical look at aspects of painting today. The
first, The Beholder’s Share*, asked how it might
be possible to situate in the space of the present, references
to the historicity of painting. Focusing primarily on representational
works, this exhibition featured artists who are re-examining
the traditional genres of painting, such as portraiture and
landscape, and the concept of the “studio painting”.
What If It’s All True? What Then? takes
as its starting point the continued relevance of abstraction
to many painters working today. Indeed, there are so many varieties
of abstract painting now that the category has almost ceased
to have a coherent meaning. Instead, therefore, of trying to
represent the full gamut of what passes as abstraction today
What If It’s All True? What Then? focuses on
fourteen painters whose work is a continued re-engagement with
Modernism, its tropes and heritage. Surface, support and mark
as gesture and sign are concerns that recur in different ways
throughout the exhibition. The exhibition suggests that these
concerns can represent a critical re-engagement with Modernist
tropes that analyses the entanglements of bodily experience,
memory and imagination, both in the making the work and in the
subject’s reception of it. It proposes, therefore, a phenomenological
interpretation as a valid means of addressing abstract painting
beyond Modernism.
What If It’s All True? What Then? is also the title
of a book which illustrates the works in the exhibition and
contains essays by Anna Moszynska, Chris Townsend and Stuart
Elliot. Anna Moszynska discusses the work of the artists in
the exhibition in the context of developments in abstraction
since the 1980s. Chris Townsend examines the ways in which “meaning”
can be attached to mark and gesture and Stuart Elliot looks
at how discussion of the current situation of abstract painting
might be orientated to the question of its potential in the
present. The book will be available 18 May.
The title of the book and exhibition is derived from the title
of an early, now destroyed text painting by John Baldessari.
Such a question could seem to speak to the notion of painting
as being plagued by problems/criticisms and so as something
embattled. Or, it could also suggest the idea of an ethical
dilemma in the face of relativising cultural, historical and
social forces: what if, in some important way, all our different
histories and explanatory frameworks have persuasive claims
on our allegiances or desires? What then?
* 13 October – 4 December 2010. The exhibition featured
the work of Philip Akkerman, Robert Bordo, Nogah Engler, Louise
Hopkins, Merlin James, Tom LaDuke, Carol Rhodes, Julie Roberts,
David Schutter and Christopher Stevens.
For enquiries, please contact Andrew Mummery at: andrew@mummeryschnelle.com
|
Part 1:



Part 2:



 |
|
|
Back to exhibitions
Click here to download
a pdf of the press release
Please scroll down for installation views |